Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 02:21

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
‘Cyberpunk 2077’ Is The Switch 2’s #2 Launch Game - Forbes
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Order of selection for 2025 NHL Draft - NHL.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
South Korea’s Venus-focused cubesat advances as larger missions face NASA cuts - SpaceNews
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Mya Lesnar, daughter to WWE legend Brock Lesnar, wins national title in shot put - ESPN
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Study shows that early humans climbed trees and worked with stone - Earth.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What is the best way to get my wife to become a hotwife?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
If you received hand-me-downs as a child, how did they make you feel?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.